Breaking

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Tuesday 26 February 2019

‘Jihadi bride’ doesn’t fit: we need a new language for female militants | Azadeh Moaveni

Tabloid sensationalism about Shamima Begum flattens important debates about how much agency these women have

There are around 150 British women in the world who can be called “jihadi brides” – those who left places such as Luton, Birmingham and Burton upon Trent to migrate to the Islamic State and eventually marry its fighters – and Shamima Begum is one of the youngest. She assumed this status as a minor, and the use of the term “jihadi bride” by journalists and commentators to describe her is appalling, a heaping of further trauma on a groomed child.

Tabloid sensationalism flattens a complicated and necessary debate about agency: whether these women had any; and how much and the extent to which they should be held accountable for the spectacular violence Isis has inflicted, even if they were not directly involved and some of them were crushed by it, too. In trying to get to the bottom of these questions for a forthcoming book, I interviewed more than 20 Isis women.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2H0XRkN

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot