Breaking

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Monday, 13 August 2018

Are female artists worth collecting? Tate doesn’t seem to think so | Helen Gørrill

The museum preaches diversity, but its annual acquistions suggest that great art is mostly created by men

The dire situation for equality in the British visual arts has been laid bare. We’ve reversed back into the Victorian age, where women can’t paint and women can’t write. My research suggests that female creatives are less likely to succeed now than they were in the 1990s. Today, when men’s artwork is signed, it goes up in value; conversely when work by women is signed, it goes down in value, and the addition of a woman’s signature can devalue artwork to the extent that female artists are more likely to leave their work unsigned. Hysteria, the female-specific Victorian malady, has returned to the UK, with women accused of being mad and out of control if they don’t conform to gallerists’ often unreasonable demands.

As the self-proclaimed master of our nation’s art collection, Tate should make urgent efforts to reflect diversity

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2P5Agkr

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot